1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION v. OFFICE DEPOT INC.
 

PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION v. OFFICE DEPOT INC.

C.A. Nos. 13-239-LPS, 13-287-LPS, 13-288-LPS, 13-289-LPS, 13-326-LPS, 13-330-LPS, 13-331-LPS, 13-404-LPS, 13-408-LPS

PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT INC., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. QVC INC., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SEARS HOLDINGS COMPANY, Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LIMITED BRANDS, INC., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GAP INC., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA INC., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., Defendant. PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NORDSTROM.COM LLC, NORDSTROM.COM INC., and NORDSTROM INC. Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 9, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Princeton Digital Image Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Sean T. O'Kelly , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC.

Princeton Digital Image Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Patrick Murray , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC & George Pazuniak , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC.

Office Depot Inc., Defendant, represented by Beth Moskow-Schnoll , Ballard Spahr LLP, Evan Whitcomb Krick , Ballard Spahr LLP, Lynn E. Rzonca , Ballard Spahr LLP, pro hac vice & Richard W. Miller , Ballard Spahr LLP, pro hac vice.

Adobe Systems Incorporated, Intervenor, represented by Kelly E. Farnan , Richards, Layton & Finger, PA & Tara D. Elliott , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.

Office Depot Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Beth Moskow-Schnoll , Ballard Spahr LLP & Evan Whitcomb Krick , Ballard Spahr LLP.

Princeton Digital Image Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Sean T. O'Kelly , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC, Daniel Patrick Murray , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC & George Pazuniak , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC.

Princeton Digital Image Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Sean T. O'Kelly , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC, Daniel Patrick Murray , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC & George Pazuniak , O'Kelly & Ernst LLC.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

At Wilmington this 9th day of August, 2017, having reviewed the parties' briefs on PDIC's motion for reargument (D.I. 223) ahd Adobe's response (D.I. 231),1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PDIC's motion (D...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases