U.S. v. METCALF

Docket No. 6:16-mj-045-MJS.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COREY METCALF, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.


AFFIDAVIT OF ALLEGED PROBATION VIOLATION(S)

MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.

I, Armin M. Najafi, Acting Legal Officer for Yosemite National Park state the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

I am the Acting Legal Officer in Yosemite National Park and serve as the prosecutor for misdemeanor matters arising in the park. I have been so employed for six months. In the normal course of my duties I, and other individuals acting in a similar capacity in my office, regularly conduct probation status reviews for defendants on court probation with the District Court in Yosemite. In the normal course of my duties, I learned that defendant Corey METCALF has failed to pay a court-ordered fine of $500.

As the Acting Legal Officer, I am aware that METCALF was charged with misappropriation of property, in violation of Title 36 Code of Federal Regulations §2.30(a)(1).

On September 20, 2016, METCALF plead guilty to misappropriation of property, in violation of Title 36 Code of Federal Regulations §2.30(a)(1). METCALF was sentenced to 12 months of unsupervised probation during which time he was ordered to obey all laws; notify the court through counsel of any law enforcement contacts; pay a $500 fine due in fully by July 2017; and had to report to the Yosemite Legal Office for Post Plea Booking. METCALF was ordered to personally appear at a review hearing on August 22, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The government alleges METCALF has violated the following condition(s) of his unsupervised probation:

CHARGE ONE: FAILURE TO PAY $500 FINE

METCALF was ordered to pay a $500 fine by July 2017. As of the date of this affidavit, METCALF has not paid any portion of the $500 fine.

Sworn to before me and subscribed in my presence in Yosemite National Park, California.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases