1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WILLIAMS v. PARAMO
 

WILLIAMS v. PARAMO

No. 2:16-cv-2928 JAM KJN P.

KENNETH WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

August 8, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth Williams, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Daniel Paramo, Respondent, represented by Pamela B. Hooley , Attorney General's Office for the State of California.

ORDER

On July 28, 2017, petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss. However, the opposition is not signed by petitioner. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that all pleadings and other written filing be signed by litigants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases