U.S. v. SANDERS

Case No. 2:16-cr-00081-JAM.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY SANDERS, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bobby Louis Sanders, Defendant, represented by Thomas A. Johnson , Johnson, Greene & Roberts LLP.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Kevin Christopher Khasigian , United States Attorney's Office.


STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Kevin Khasigian, Assistant United States Attorney, together with Thomas A. Johnson, counsel for defendant, Bobby Sanders, hereby stipulate the following:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Jury Trial on October 30, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. and a Trial Confirmation Hearing to September 19, 2017, at 9:15 a.m. 2. By this stipulation, Defendant now moves to continue the Jury Trial to March 19, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. and a Trial Confirmation Hearing to February 13, 2018, at 9:15 a.m. and to exclude time between October 30, 2017, and, March 19, 2018, under the Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare). 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request the Court find the following: a. A continuance is requested because counsel for the defendant needs additional time to review the discovery, conduct investigation, and discuss a potential resolution. Furthermore, defense counsel recently underwent knee surgery on July 21, 2017. See Exhibit A. Defense counsel has submitted a declaration concerning his availability for trial in October which has been labeled Exhibit B. b. Counsel for defendant believes the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. c. The Government does not object to the continuance. d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) within which trial must commence, the time period of October 30, 2017, to March 19, 2018, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases