CLIFF v. MATEVOUSIAN

No. 1:17-cv-00641-DAD-JLT.

ANTRONE CLIFF, Petitioner, v. ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Antrone Cliff, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Andre Matevousian, Respondent, represented by Timothy Howard Delgado , United States Attorney's Office.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REFERRING BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

(Doc. Nos. 8, 13)

DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.

Petitioner is proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on May 18, 2017. (Doc. No. 8.) On May 22, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending petitioner's motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. No. 13). These findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days from the date of service. To date, no party has filed objections, and the time in which to do so has passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the undersigned has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the undersigned concludes that the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Given the foregoing:

1. The findings and recommendations issued May 22, 2017 (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in full; 2. Petitioner's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8) is denied; and 3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases