SAMUELS v. AHLIN

Case No. 1:10-cv-00585-DAD-EPG (PC).

DOUGAL SAMUELS, Plaintiff, v. PAM AHLIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 555 Prison Conditions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dougal Samuels, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Pam Ahlin, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Stephen Mayberg, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Fresno County Board of Supervisors, Defendant, represented by Scott Charles Hawkins , County Counsel.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Audrey King, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Brandon Price, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Karin Hundal, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Ron Howard, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Cynthia Radavasky, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.

Robert Withrow, Defendant, represented by Christine M. Murphy , Office Of The Attorney General.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF NO. 75)

ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.

Dougal Samuels ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 24, 2017, the Court issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff's section 1983 claim against Fresno County Board of Supervisors be dismissed, and that the County of Fresno's motion to quash service of process be granted. (ECF No. 74).

On August 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and a request "for an extension of time in order to make proper service of defendants Fresno County Board of Supervisor." (ECF No. 75).1 Plaintiff asks for thirty days so that he can identify the individual members of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors and substitute them in place of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors.

The Court will grant Plaintiff thirty days to file additional objections to the findings and recommendations. In his objections, Plaintiff may identify the defendants he wants to substitute into the case, and request that he be allowed to substitute them into the case. The County of Fresno will be given seven days from the date the objections are filed in CM/ECF to serve and file a reply to the objections.

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of service of this order to file additional objections to the findings and recommendations. The County of Fresno has seven days from the date the objections are filed in CM/ECF to serve and file a reply to the objections.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Based on Plaintiff's objections, it appears that Plaintiff may believe that the Court found that substituting the County of Fresno in place of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors would be improper. The Court did not make this finding.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases