EMPLOYEES OF OHIO GEN. ASSEMBLY v. OHIO BALLOT BD.

Case No. 2:16-cv-1030.

275 F.Supp.3d 849 (2017)

COMMITTEE TO IMPOSE TERM LIMITS ON THE OHIO SUPREME COURT AND TO PRECLUDE SPECIAL LEGAL STATUS FOR MEMBERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OHIO BALLOT BOARD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

Signed July 28, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher P. Finney , Finney Law Firm, LLC, Curt Carl Hartman , Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiffs.

Jordan S. Berman , Nicole M. Koppitch , Renata Y. Staff , Sarah Elaine Pierce , Ohio Attorney Generals Office Constitutional Offices Section, Columbus, OH, for Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER

Ohio permits its citizens to amend the state constitution by proposing an amendment to electors through a petition, garnering sufficient signatures, placing the proposed amendment on the ballot, and having the proposed amendment approved by a majority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases