BEBEE v. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.

Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-763.

SABINA BEBEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

March 29, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Product Liability
Nature of Suit: 365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sabina Bebee, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Sabina Bebee, Plaintiff, represented by Levi James Benton , Levi Benton & Associates PLLC & Roy A. Camberg , The Camberg Law Firm.

Mary Sullivan, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Nicole Garner, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Amy Yarbrough, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Robert Yarbrough, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

David Renaud, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Xavier Renaud, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Barbara Perez, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin L. Hall, III , Hall Law Firm.

Motorola Solutions, Inc., Defendant, represented by Ben T. Zinnecker , Weinstein Tippetts & Little LLP & Matthew E. Coveler , Weinstein Tippetts Little LLP.

Scott Safety, Inc., Defendant, represented by P. Randall Crump , Shook Hardy Bacon LLP.

Scott Health and Safety, Inc., Defendant, represented by P. Randall Crump , Shook Hardy Bacon LLP.

Motorola, Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew E. Coveler , Weinstein Tippetts Little LLP.

Scott Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jeffrey E. Elkins , Shook Hardy Bacon LLP & P. Randall Crump , Shook Hardy Bacon LLP.

Jack Sullivan, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Elliott Michael Cin , Attorney at Law.


ORDER AND OPINION

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Document No. 16). Defendant Motorola filed a Response (Document No. 20), and Plaintiffs filed a Reply. (Document No. 22). Having considered these filings, the facts in the record, and the applicable law, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases