JOHNSON v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. C 09-05503 JSW.

MARK JOHNSON, FRANCO S. CALZOLAI, and MICHAEL R. BRYANT, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF SAN FRANCISCO, and THE SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Murlene L. Randle , Law Offices Of Murlene J. Randle.

Franco S. Calzolai, Plaintiff, represented by Murlene L. Randle , Law Offices Of Murlene J. Randle.

Michael R. Bryant, Plaintiff, represented by Murlene L. Randle , Law Offices Of Murlene J. Randle.

City and County of San Francisco, Defendant, represented by Gina Marie Roccanova , Meyers Nave, Elizabeth Suzanne Salveson , San Francisco City Attorney's Office, Jenica Diane Maldonado , Office of the City Attorney, Jonathan C. Rolnick , City Attorney's Office & Rose-Ellen Heinz Fairgrieve , City Attorney's Office.

Civil Service Commission of San Francisco, Defendant, represented by Gina Marie Roccanova , Meyers Nave, Jonathan C. Rolnick , City Attorney's Office, Elizabeth Suzanne Salveson , San Francisco City Attorney's Office & Rose-Ellen Heinz Fairgrieve , City Attorney's Office.

San Francisco Fire Department, Defendant, represented by Gina Marie Roccanova , Meyers Nave, Jonathan C. Rolnick , City Attorney's Office, Elizabeth Suzanne Salveson , San Francisco City Attorney's Office & Rose-Ellen Heinz Fairgrieve , City Attorney's Office.

S.F. Fire Commision, Defendant, represented by Gina Marie Roccanova , Meyers Nave, Jonathan C. Rolnick , City Attorney's Office & Rose-Ellen Heinz Fairgrieve , City Attorney's Office.


ORDER RE THRESHOLD LEGAL ISSUES

Now before the Court is the motion filed by Mark Johnson, Franco S. Calzolai, and Michael R. Bryant ("Plaintiffs") to resolve threshold legal issues. On January 23, 2017, this Court ordered that the parties brief threshold legal issues they deemed necessary for resolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases