ROWE v. CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT, INC.

No. 16 C 9917.

CURTIS ROWE and ROWE FOOD HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT, INC, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

April 12, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Curtis Rowe, Plaintiff, represented by Jackie Christine Condella , Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm.

Curtis Rowe, Plaintiff, represented by Xiaoyin Cao , Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm & Carmen David Caruso , Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm.

Rowe Food Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Carmen David Caruso , Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm, Jackie Christine Condella , Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm & Xiaoyin Cao , Carmen D. Caruso Law Firm.

Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jeremy J. Glenn , Cozen O'Connor, Joseph E. Tilson , Cozen O'Connor, Juan Carlos Enjamio , Hunton & Williams LLP, pro hac vice & Samuel A. Danon , Hunton & Williams LLP, pro hac vice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Curtis Rowe and his company (together, "Rowe") allege in this suit that Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. discriminated against him in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 when it declined to enter into franchise agreements with him to operate two Checkers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases