FIMCO, INC. v. WOOTTON NEW HOLLAND, LLC

Case No. CIV-16-1323-R.

FIMCO, INC. d/b/a Ag Spray Equipment, Plaintiff, v. WOOTTON NEW HOLLAND, LLC, CAPITAL MACHINERY I CORP., DARRELL WOOTTON, DEREK WOOTTON, COREY ALDRIDGE, DALE CORNELIUS, JONATHAN CORNELIUS, AND SEAN RAIMBEAULT Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

March 21, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

FIMCO Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Shannon P. Wheeler , Titus Hillis Reynolds Love Dickman & McCalmon.

FIMCO Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory C. Scaglione , Koley Jessen PC LLO & Kristin Krueger , Koley Jessen PC LLO.

Wootton New Holland LLC, Defendant, represented by Craig M. Regens , Gable & Gotwals.

Captial Machinery I Corp, Defendant, represented by Craig M. Regens , Gable & Gotwals.

Darrell Wootton, Defendant, represented by C. Eric Shephard , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens & Kevin R. Donelson , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens.

Derek Wootton, Defendant, represented by C. Eric Shephard , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens & Kevin R. Donelson , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens.

Corey Aldridge, Defendant, represented by C. Eric Shephard , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens & Kevin R. Donelson , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens.

Dale Cornelius, Defendant, represented by C. Eric Shephard , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens & Kevin R. Donelson , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens.

Jonathan Cornelius, Defendant, represented by C. Eric Shephard , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens & Kevin R. Donelson , Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens.

Sean Raimbeault, Defendant, represented by Craig M. Regens , Gable & Gotwals.


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss claims against Capital Machinery I Corp. and Sean Raimbeault. (Doc. 17). For the reasons that follow, that Motion is DENIED.

I. Background

This case concerns farming and agricultural equipment that Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases