GRAVES v. PENZONE

No. CV-77-00479-PHX-NVW.

Fred Graves, Isaac Popoca, on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of all pretrial detainees in the Maricopa County Jails, Plaintiffs, v. Paul Penzone, Sheriff of Maricopa County; Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo, Denny Barney, Steve Chucri, and Clint L. Hickman, Maricopa County Supervisors, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

March 1, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Graves, Plaintiff, represented by Margaret Winter , ACLU.

Fred Graves, Plaintiff, represented by Theodore C. Jarvi , Law Offices of Theodore Jarvi, Daniel Joseph Pochoda , ACLU, Eric Balaban , ACLU, Gabriel Eber , ACLU & Kathleen E. Brody , ACLU.

Isaac Popoca, Plaintiff, represented by Margaret Winter , ACLU, Theodore C. Jarvi , Law Offices of Theodore Jarvi, Daniel Joseph Pochoda , ACLU, Eric Balaban , ACLU, Gabriel Eber , ACLU & Kathleen E. Brody , ACLU.

Paul Penzone, Defendant, represented by Michele Marie Iafrate , Iafrate & Associates & Sherle Rubin Flaggman , Maricopa County Attorneys Office - Civil Services Division.

Bill Gates, Defendant, represented by Michele Marie Iafrate , Iafrate & Associates & Sherle Rubin Flaggman , Maricopa County Attorneys Office - Civil Services Division.

Steve Gallardo, Defendant, represented by Michele Marie Iafrate , Iafrate & Associates & Sherle Rubin Flaggman , Maricopa County Attorneys Office - Civil Services Division.

Denny Barney, Defendant, represented by Michele Marie Iafrate , Iafrate & Associates.

Steve Chucri, Defendant, represented by Michele Marie Iafrate , Iafrate & Associates.

Clint L Hickman, Defendant, represented by Michele Marie Iafrate , Iafrate & Associates.

Todd Wilcox, Dr, Movant, represented by Stephen C. Clark , Jones Waldo Holbrook & McDonough.


ORDER

Before the Court are the following:

(1) Defendants' Report of Data Collected and Summarized (Doc. 2333) regarding Defendants' compliance with Paragraph 5 of the Revised Fourth Amended Judgment, Defendants' supplemental report (Doc. 2336), Plaintiffs' response (Doc. 2372), and Defendants...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases