VESTA CORPORATION v. AMDOCS MANAGEMENT LIMITED

No. 3:14-cv-01142-HZ.

VESTA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AMDOCS MANAGEMENT LIMITED and AMDOCS, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

February 21, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 370 Other Fraud
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vesta Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew S. Ong , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, pro hac vice.

Vesta Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Clayton C. James , Hogan Lovells US LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel T. Keese , Perkins Coie, LLP, Erick J. Haynie , Perkins Coie, LLP, Joanna T. Perini-Abbott , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Joseph E. Mais , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Julia E. Markley , Perkins Coie, LLP, Karen B. Bloom , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Michael A. Oblon , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Nathan R. Kassebaum , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Scott D. Eads , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Stephen F. English , Perkins Coie, LLP, William K. Miller , Perkins Coie, LLP, pro hac vice, Jason A. Wrubleski , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt & Meredith M. Price , Perkins Coie, LLP.

Amdocs Management Limited, Defendant, represented by Andrew G. Klevorn , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Bruce G. Vanyo , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua L. Ross , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Meegan I. Maczek , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Richard H. Zelichov , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Robert A. Shlachter , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Yonaton M. Rosenzweig , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Christina Lucen Costley , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Jennifer S. Wagner , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter & Timothy S. DeJong , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC.

Amdocs, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew G. Klevorn , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Bruce G. Vanyo , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Christina Lucen Costley , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua L. Ross , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Kristin J. Achterhof , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Meegan I. Maczek , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Richard H. Zelichov , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Robert A. Shlachter , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC, Yonaton M. Rosenzweig , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, pro hac vice, Jennifer S. Wagner , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter & Timothy S. DeJong , Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, PC.

Sprint/United Management Company, Interested Party, represented by A. Brooks Gresham , McGuireWoods, LLP, pro hac vice, Arsen Kourinian , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice, Blake S. Olson , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice & Wendy E. Lyon , Riddell Williams PS.


OPINION & ORDER

In this discovery dispute, Plaintiff Vesta Corporation seeks to compel Defendants Amdocs Management Limited and Amdocs, Inc. to produce source code responsive to Plaintiff's Request for Production 37. The Court orders Defendants to produce the requested source code.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases