1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HENRY v. NORTH CAROLINA ACUPUNCTURE LICENSING BOARD
 

HENRY v. NORTH CAROLINA ACUPUNCTURE LICENSING BOARD

No. 1:15CV831.

ELIZABETH HENRY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTH CAROLINA ACUPUNCTURE LICENSING BOARD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

January 30, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti - Trust
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ELIZABETH HENRY, Plaintiff, represented by CAROLINE P. MACKIE , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

ELIZABETH HENRY, Plaintiff, represented by JOHN M. DURNOVICH , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP & ANDREW H. ERTESCHIK , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

AART SCHULENKLOPPER, Plaintiff, represented by CAROLINE P. MACKIE , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, JOHN M. DURNOVICH , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP & ANDREW H. ERTESCHIK , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

EILEEN CARTER, Plaintiff, represented by CAROLINE P. MACKIE , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, JOHN M. DURNOVICH , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP & ANDREW H. ERTESCHIK , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

SHONDELL JONES, Plaintiff, represented by CAROLINE P. MACKIE , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, JOHN M. DURNOVICH , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP & ANDREW H. ERTESCHIK , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

JAN BURKHARD-CATLIN, Plaintiff, represented by CAROLINE P. MACKIE , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, JOHN M. DURNOVICH , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP & ANDREW H. ERTESCHIK , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

LINDSAY PURRINGTON, Plaintiff, represented by CAROLINE P. MACKIE , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, JOHN M. DURNOVICH , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP & ANDREW H. ERTESCHIK , POYNER SPRUILL, LLP.

NORTH CAROLINA ACUPUNCTURE LICENSING BOARD, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

EMMYLOU NORFLEET, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

M. CISSY MAJEBE, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

KAREN VAUGHN, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

VIKKI ANDREWS, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

CHESTER PHILLIPS, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

MARC CUTLER, Defendant, represented by CHARLOT F. WOOD , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A., ANDREW ALLEN FREEMAN , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A. & DANIEL ALAN M. RULEY , BELL DAVIS & PITT, P.A..

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the court on three motions — one by Plaintiffs and two by Defendants. Defendants move for a stay pending state court resolution of a related case (Doc. 20) and move to dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 22). Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases