1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 222 F.Supp.3d
  5. 222 F.Supp.3d 779 (2016)
 

CLAIR v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.

Case No. 16-cv-04911-VC.

222 F.Supp.3d 779 (2016)

Michael St. CLAIR, Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed December 30, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Trinette Gragirena Kent , Kent Law Offices, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff.

Mark Stephen Eisen , David S. Almeida , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Chicago, IL, Tenaya M. Rodewald , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

Michael St. Clair has sued CVS Pharmacy under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for sending automated calls to his cell phone about prescription refills, even after he requested that the calls stop. Specifically...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases