1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LOUISVILLE MARKETING, INC. v. JEWELRY CANDLES, LLC
 

LOUISVILLE MARKETING, INC. v. JEWELRY CANDLES, LLC

Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-00084-DJH.

LOUISVILLE MARKETING, INC. d/b/a as JEWELRY IN CANDLES, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant. v. JEWELRY CANDLES, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant, v. P. MICAH BUSE, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division.

November 4, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louisville Marketing Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Christopher A. Bates , Seiller Waterman, LLC.

Louisville Marketing Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Shawn Fox , Seiller Waterman, LLC & Kyle Anne Citrynell , Seiller Waterman, LLC.

Jewelry Candles, LLC, Defendant, represented by William L. Montague, Jr. , Montague Law PLLC.

P. Micah Buse, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Kyle Anne Citrynell , Seiller Waterman, LLC, Christopher A. Bates , Seiller Waterman, LLC & Christopher Shawn Fox , Seiller Waterman, LLC.

Jewelry Candles, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by William L. Montague, Jr. , Montague Law PLLC.

Louisville Marketing Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Christopher A. Bates , Seiller Waterman, LLC, Christopher Shawn Fox , Seiller Waterman, LLC & Kyle Anne Citrynell , Seiller Waterman, LLC.

Jewelry Candles, LLC, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Kyle Anne Citrynell , Seiller Waterman, LLC, Christopher A. Bates , Seiller Waterman, LLC, Christopher Shawn Fox , Seiller Waterman, LLC & William L. Montague, Jr. , Montague Law PLLC.

Louisville Marketing Inc., ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Christopher A. Bates , Seiller Waterman, LLC, Christopher Shawn Fox , Seiller Waterman, LLC & Kyle Anne Citrynell , Seiller Waterman, LLC.

MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Louisville Marketing, Inc., doing business as Jewelry in Candles, and Micah Buse (collectively referred to herein as "LMI") have filed two motions in limine and one motion to strike relating to proposed expert testimony and reports proffered by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases