LUND v. 3M COMPANY

Case No. CV 13-02776 DDP (VBKx).

VICTORIA LUND, individually and as successor-in-interest to WILLIAM LUND, deceased; DAVID LUND, an individual; and SHEILA LUND, an individual, as legal heirs of WILLIAM LUND, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY a/k/a MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

October 24, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Nature of Suit: 368 P.I. : Asbestos
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victoria Lund, Plaintiff, represented by Benno B. Ashrafi , Weitz and Luxenberg PC.

Victoria Lund, Plaintiff, represented by Alexandra Shef , Weitz and Luxenburg PC., Josiah W. Parker , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Mark D. Bratt , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Peter C. Beirne , Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. & Tyler Robert Stock .

David Lund, Plaintiff, represented by Benno B. Ashrafi , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Alexandra Shef , Weitz and Luxenburg PC., Josiah W. Parker , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Mark D. Bratt , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Peter C. Beirne , Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. & Tyler Robert Stock .

Sheila Lund, Plaintiff, represented by Benno B. Ashrafi , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Alexandra Shef , Weitz and Luxenburg PC., Josiah W. Parker , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Mark D. Bratt , Weitz and Luxenberg PC, Peter C. Beirne , Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. & Tyler Robert Stock .

Blackmer Pump Company, Defendant, represented by James P. Cunningham , Tucker Ellis LLP.

BW IP Inc, Defendant, represented by Holly Acevedo , Foley and Mansfield PLLP, Keith M. Ameele , Foley and Mansfield PLLP, Stephen J. Foley , Foley and Mansfield PLLP & Joshua R. Shoumer , Foley and Mansfield PLLP.

Crane Co, Defendant, represented by Geoffrey M. Davis , K&L Gates LLP, Bradley W. Gunning , K&L Gates LLP, Kathleen L. Beiermeister , Meagher and Geer PLLP, pro hac vice, Michael J. Sechler , K&L Gates LLP, pro hac vice & William M. Starr , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP, pro hac vice.

Electric Boat Corporation, Defendant, represented by James C. Parker , Hugo Parker LLP, Charles S. Park , Hugo Parker, LLP, Christina M. Glezakos , Hugo Parker LLP, Edward R. Hugo , Brydon Hugo and Parker, Gregory S. Rosse , Hugo and Parker, Jeffrey P. Wilson , Jackson Jenkins Renstrom LLP, Lisa M. Rickenbacher , Hugo Parker LLP, Paul M. Bessette , Demler Armstrong and Rowland LLP & Shelley K. Tinkoff , Brydon Hugo & Parker.

General Dynamics Corporation, Defendant, represented by Charles S. Park , Hugo Parker, LLP, Christina M. Glezakos , Hugo Parker LLP, Edward R. Hugo , Brydon Hugo and Parker, Gregory S. Rosse , Hugo and Parker, Jeffrey P. Wilson , Jackson Jenkins Renstrom LLP, Lisa M. Rickenbacher , Hugo Parker LLP, Paul M. Bessette , Demler Armstrong and Rowland LLP & Shelley K. Tinkoff , Brydon Hugo & Parker.

Goulds Pumps Inc, Defendant, represented by Michael J. Pietrykowski , Gordon and Rees LLP, G. Jeff Coons , Gordon and Rees LLP & Glen R. Powell , Gordon and Rees LLP.

Hopeman Brothers Inc, Defendant, represented by Jonathan E. Meislin , Bassi Edlin Huie and Blum LLP, Robert S. Kraft , Bassi Edlin Huie and Blum LLP & E. Reno Cross , Bassi Edlin Huie and Blum LLP.

The Nash Engineering Company, Defendant, represented by Arturo E. Sandoval , Foley and Mansfield PLLP, Douglas G. Wah , Foley and Mansfield PLLP & Khaled Taqi-Eddin , Foley and Mansfield PLLP.

The William Powell Company, Defendant, represented by Arturo E. Sandoval , Foley and Mansfield PLLP, Douglas G. Wah , Foley and Mansfield PLLP & Khaled Taqi-Eddin , Foley and Mansfield PLLP.

Viad Corporation, Defendant, represented by Peter B. Langbord , Foley and Mansfield PLLP & Anna K. Milunas , Foley and Mansfield PLLP.

Warren Pumps LLC, Defendant, represented by Glen R. Powell , Gordon and Rees LLP.

Crosby Valve, LLC, Defendant, represented by Kevin D. Jamison , Pond North LLP, Rochelle R. Ileto , Pond North LLP, Russell W. Schatz, Jr. , Pond North LLP & Joseph Duffy , Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AN ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE

[Dkt. 857]

Presently before the court is Plaintiffs Victoria Lund, individually and as successor-in-interest to William Lund, deceased, David Lund, and Shelia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases