SETTGAST v. MAINE MINERAL & GEM MUSEUM

Case No. C 16-00909 SBA, Related to Case No. C 16-05106 SBA.

STEPHAN SETTGAST, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MAINE MINERAL & GEM MUSEUM, a Maine Corporation; DARRYL PITT, an individual; LAWRENCE STIFLER, an individual; and MARY McFADDEN, an individual, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division.

October 12, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephan Settgast, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Curtis Edmondson , Law Offices of J. Curtis Edmondson.

Stephan Settgast, Plaintiff, represented by Keith Pitt , Slinde Nelson Stanford.

Darryl Pitt, Defendant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Lawrence Stifler, Defendant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Mary McFadden, Defendant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Lawrence Stifler, Counter-claimant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Darryl Pitt, Counter-claimant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Mary McFadden, Counter-claimant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Stephan Settgast, Counter-defendant, represented by Joseph Curtis Edmondson , Law Offices of J. Curtis Edmondson & Keith Pitt , Slinde Nelson Stanford.

Darryl Pitt, Counter-claimant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Lawrence Stifler, Counter-claimant, represented by Susan Laura Klein , Valle Makoff LLP & Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Mary McFadden, Counter-claimant, represented by Jeffrey Boyd Valle , VALLE MAKOFF LLP.

Stephan Settgast, Counter-defendant, represented by Joseph Curtis Edmondson , Law Offices of J. Curtis Edmondson & Keith Pitt , Slinde Nelson Stanford.


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, see Dkt. 34, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases