U.S. v. MELIOLI

Criminal No. 11-cr-20129.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-15 RAYMOND CHARLES MELIOLI, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

May 31, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Raymond Roberts, Defendant, represented by Craig A. Tank , Craig A. Tank PLLC & Richard D. Korn .

David Thomas Roberts, Defendant, represented by Loren M. Dickstein .

Patrick Michael McKeoun, Defendant, represented by Sidney Kraizman , Kraizman & Kraizman.

Jeff Garvin Smith, Defendant, represented by Jerome Sabbota , Ribitwer & Sabbota.

Paul Anthony Darrah, Defendant, represented by Patricia A. Maceroni , Law Offices of Patricia A. Maceroni, PLLC.

Cary Dale Vandiver, Defendant, represented by Mark A. Satawa , Satawa Law, Pllc.

Vincent John Witort, Defendant, represented by Kimberly W. Stout , Byron H. Pitts , Cornelius Pitts Assoc. & Phillip D. Comorski .

Michael William Mastromatteo, Defendant, represented by Christopher M. Seikaly & Mark A. Satawa , Satawa Law, Pllc.

Vernon Nelson Rich, Defendant, represented by Juan A. Mateo, Jr. .

John Renny Riede, Defendant, represented by Patrick M. Cleary .

Victor Carlos Castano, Defendant, represented by Richard G. Convertino , Lenore M. Ferber , Convertino & Associates & Robert M. Morgan .

Gary Lee Nelson, Defendant, represented by Samuel J. Churikian .

Michael Kenneth Rich, Defendant, represented by Robert M. Morgan .

Raymond Charles Melioli, Defendant, represented by Claude T. Beavers , C.T. Beavers & Associates, PLLC.

David Randy Drozdowski, Defendant, represented by Robert M. Morgan & Ryan H. Machasic , Ryan H. Machasic, PC.

Tony Wayne Kitchens, Defendant, represented by Thomas W. Jakuc , Thomas Legal Centers.

Sylvester Gerard Wesaw, Defendant, represented by David R. Cripps .

Clifford Chansel Rhodes, II, Defendant, represented by Edward C. Wishnow .

Michael John Palazzola, Defendant, represented by Gerald J. Gleeson, II , Miller Canfield Paddock & Stone, PLC.

Danny Russell Burby, Jr, Defendant, represented by Michael A. Rataj .

Jason Joseph Cook, Defendant, represented by Stevens J. Jacobs , Jacobs Law Office, P.C..

Edward Allen Taylor, Defendant, represented by Nicholas J. Vendittelli .

Salvatore Battaglia, Defendant, represented by Martin E. Crandall , Clark Hill.

William Scott Lonsby, Defendant, represented by Robert F. Kinney, III .

Wayne Russell Werth, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey M. Day , Gorte and Day.

Jennifer Lee Cicola, Defendant, represented by Ben M. Gonek , Law Offices of Ben M. Gonek, PLLC.

Alexis Catherine May, Defendant, represented by Mark H. Magidson .

John Charles Scudder, Defendant, represented by Joseph R. Arnone , Arnone & Lawter, PLLC.

Douglas Russell Smith, Defendant, represented by Alvin C. Sallen , Alvin C. Sallen Assoc..

Mark Wenglasz, Defendant, represented by Matt Savich .

Tamara Allard, Defendant, represented by Jonathan M. Jones .

United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Linda Aouate , U.S. Attorney's Office, Saima S. Mohsin , U.S. Attorney's Office, Eric M. Straus , United States Attorney's Office, Ivana Nizich , United States Department of Justice-Criminal Division, Jerome Maiatico , United States Department of Justice & Robert J. Patton , U.S. Department of Justice.


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2, and based upon Defendant Raymond Charles Melioli's guilty plea to Count One of the Tenth Superseding Information, the contents of Defendant's Rule 11 Plea Agreement, the Government's Application for Entry of Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, and other information in the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. Defendant shall forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of his violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and any property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit or to facilitate the commission of such violations.

2. Defendant shall not contest, or assist anyone else in contesting, the forfeiture of all of the firearms, silencers and ammunition, U.S. Currency, motorcycles, slot machines, tools, computers, thumb drives, laptops, cameras, monitors, electronic equipment, "Colors" including but not limited to center wheel, vests, pins and patches, clothing, merchandise, jewelry, paraphernalia, and other personal property bearing any Devil's Diciples' labeling, markings, logos or symbols, that were seized in connection with the investigation of this case, as well as those seized in connection with the investigation and prosecution of United States v. Jeff Garvin Smith, et. al., Case No. 11-20066, United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, in any forfeiture action or proceeding.

3. Defendant shall not contest, or assist anyone else in contesting, the forfeiture of the real properties that are the subject of the following civil actions: United States v. One Parcel of Real Property Known as 43653 Gratiot, Clinton Township, Michigan, Case No. 09-cv-11208 and United States v. One Parcel of Real Property Known as 2424 Little Street, Port Huron, Michigan, Case No. 09-cv-11212, United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan.

4. Defendant shall not contest, or assist anyone else in contesting, the forfeiture of all Devil's Diciples' websites, markings, service marks, trademarks, names and "Colors," in any forfeiture action or proceeding.

5. Defendant shall not contest the forfeiture of, or file a petition or claim in connection with, any property that the government seeks to forfeit from any other defendant in this case, and from any defendant in United States v. Jeff Garvin Smith, et. al., Case No. 11-20066, United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan.

6. This Order shall become final as to Defendant at the time it is entered.

7. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(e).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases