Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jennifer Whalen, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Cory Steven Fein , Attorney at Law, Craig Ripley Spiegel , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Cynthia B. Chapman , Caddell & Chapman, Michael A. Caddell , Caddell & Chapman, Catherine Gannon , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Gregory Michael Travalio , Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, James C. Shah , Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller and Shah, LLP, Jason Allen Zweig , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff A. Almeida , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Jeff D Friedman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeffrey Scott Goldenberg , Goldenberg Schneider, LPA, Jeniphr A.E. Breckenridge , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Joseph B. Kennedy , One Harverford Centre, Joseph Bryce Kenney , Chimicles and Tikellis, Joseph G. Sauder , Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, Kyle J McGee , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Mark Philip Pifko , Baron & Budd, P.C., Mark Hayden Troutman , Isaac Wiles Burkholder Teetor, Matthew David Schelkopf , Chimicles and Tikellis LLP, Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith , Hagens Berman, Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Tyler S. Weaver , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP & Vincent Louis DiTommaso , DiTommaso Lubin, P.C..
Thomas Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Craig Ripley Spiegel , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff D Friedman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy , One Harverford Centre, Kyle J McGee , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C., Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP & Vincent Louis DiTommaso , DiTommaso Lubin, P.C..
Joe D'Aguanno, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Craig Ripley Spiegel , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Shana E. Scarlett , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Gregory Michael Travalio , Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, Jason Allen Zweig , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff A. Almeida , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Jeff D Friedman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy , One Harverford Centre, Kyle J McGee , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith , Hagens Berman, Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP & Vincent Louis DiTommaso , DiTommaso Lubin, P.C..
Deb Makowski, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Craig Ripley Spiegel , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Shana E. Scarlett , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Gregory Michael Travalio , Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, Jason Allen Zweig , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff A. Almeida , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Jeff D Friedman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy , One Harverford Centre, Kyle J McGee , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith , Hagens Berman, Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP & Vincent Louis DiTommaso , DiTommaso Lubin, P.C..
Jose Randy Rodriguez, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Craig Ripley Spiegel , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Shana E. Scarlett , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Gregory Michael Travalio , Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, Jason Allen Zweig , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff A. Almeida , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Jeff D Friedman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy , One Harverford Centre, Kyle J McGee , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith , Hagens Berman, Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP & Vincent Louis DiTommaso , DiTommaso Lubin, P.C..
Michael Ervin, Plaintiff, represented by Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Craig Ripley Spiegel , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Shana E. Scarlett , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Gregory Michael Travalio , Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder Teetor, LLC, Jason Allen Zweig , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Jeff A. Almeida , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Jeff D Friedman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Joseph B. Kennedy , One Harverford Centre, Kyle J McGee , Grant and Eisenhofer P.A., Roland K. Tellis , Baron Budd, P.C., Shelby Smith , Hagens Berman, Steve W. Berman , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP & Vincent Louis DiTommaso , DiTommaso Lubin, P.C..
Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Randall W. Edwards , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Brian Christopher Anderson , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, David Richard Dorey , OMelveny Myers LLP, Jaime Arturo Saenz , Colvin Chaney Saenz Rodriguez LLP, Janet L. Conigliaro , DYKEMA & Scott M Hammack , O'Melveny and Myers.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11]
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Third Amended Class Action Complaint in the above-titled action in this Court and served it on Defendant Ford Motor Company ("Ford") on October 13, 2015;
WHEREAS, the Third Amended Class Action Complaint includes 19 plaintiffs from 12 states collectively stating 44 causes of action;
WHEREAS, Ford filed the Answer to Third Amended Class Action Complaint on October 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-2 provides that the points and authorities in support of a motion for class certification may not exceed 25 pages;
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief, including permission "to exceed otherwise applicable page limitations," pursuant to a stipulation by the parties;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will be filing their Motion for Class Certification on or before January 28, 2015;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs anticipate that they will need 50 pages to adequately address the elements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b) in light of the number of allegations and causes of action in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint;
WHEREAS, Ford expects that it may need to seek an extension of the page limit for its opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification; however, until it has the opportunity to review Plaintiffs' brief, it cannot know how much, if any, additional pages it will need;
WHEREAS, Ford reserves the right, if necessary, to seek an extension of the page limits for its opposition brief at the appropriate time; and
WHEREAS, execution of this stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses Plaintiffs or Ford may otherwise have;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiffs shall have leave to file a memorandum of points and authorities of no more than 50 pages in support of their Motion for Class Certification to be filed on or before January 28, 2015.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Comment
User Comments