1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SCHROEDER v. PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER, INC.
 

SCHROEDER v. PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER, INC.

Case No. 15-cv-02930-HSG.

PETER SCHROEDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 20, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Schroeder, Plaintiff, represented by Richard Martin Grant , Brayton Purcell LLP, Alan R. Brayton , Brayton Purcell LLP, David R. Donadio , Brayton Purcell LLP, Gilbert Lynn Purcell , Brayton Purcell LLP, James Patrick Nevin, Jr. , Brayton Purcell & Nancy Teresa Williams , Brayton-Purcell.

Arcelia Schroeder, Plaintiff, represented by Richard Martin Grant , Brayton Purcell LLP, Alan R. Brayton , Brayton Purcell LLP, David R. Donadio , Brayton Purcell LLP, Gilbert Lynn Purcell , Brayton Purcell LLP, James Patrick Nevin, Jr. , Brayton Purcell & Nancy Teresa Williams , Brayton-Purcell.

Puget Sound Commerce Center, Inc., Defendant, represented by George D. Yaron , Yaron & Associates, Demian David Steele , Yaron & Associates & Keith E. Patterson , Yaron & Associates.

ORDER

On July 2, 2015 the parties filed a notice of settlement "to notify the Court that the lawsuit has been settled, and to request 45 days in which to file the dismissal." Dkt. No. 14. The Court interpreted this notice to mean that the entire case has settled—i.e., all parties and all claims. However, on July 8, the parties stipulated to the dismissal of a single Defendant, which the Court granted. Dkt. No. 16. And on July 17, the parties stipulated to the dismissal of "all allegations . . . related to exposure to asbestos on or after December 5, 1980, as to Defendant PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER, INC." Dkt. No. 18.

It is unclear to the Court why the dismissal of this case is occurring piecemeal. If the parties have settled the entire case, as indicated in the July 2 notice, the parties should file a single stipulated dismissal before the 45-day deadline. If all of the parties have not settled all of the claims of the case, the parties must so inform the Court. Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to file by July 24, 2015, a brief statement summarizing the status of the case and their plans for dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases