IN RE URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 13-5978.

In re URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 4, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DAVID SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff, represented by DAVID A. ROSENFELD , ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP, DEBORAH R. GROSS , LAW OFFICES BERNARD M. GROSS, PC, JACK REISE , ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP & STEPHEN R. ASTLEY , ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., Defendant, represented by MARC J. SONNENFELD , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP & KAREN PIESLAK POHLMANN , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP.

RICHARD A. HAYNE, Defendant, represented by MARC J. SONNENFELD , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP & KAREN PIESLAK POHLMANN , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP.

FRANK J. CONFORTI, Defendant, represented by MARC J. SONNENFELD , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP & KAREN PIESLAK POHLMANN , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP.

TEDFORD G. MARLOW, Defendant, represented by MARC J. SONNENFELD , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP & KAREN PIESLAK POHLMANN , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP.

DAVID W. MCCREIGHT, Defendant, represented by MARC J. SONNENFELD , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP & KAREN PIESLAK POHLMANN , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP.

DAVID HAYNES, Defendant, represented by MARC J. SONNENFELD , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP & KAREN PIESLAK POHLMANN , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint (Document 16), defendants' brief and documents in support thereof, Plaintiff's Opposition thereto (Document 18) and documents in support thereof, and defendants' Reply (Document 19), and following oral argument, for reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document 16) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the respective parties shall appear on May 15, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 8B at the U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19106 for a scheduling hearing.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases