1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RICHEY v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH
 

RICHEY v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH

No. 3:14-cv-170 JWS.

Andrea Richey, Plaintiff, v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Alaska.

February 20, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrea Richey, Plaintiff, represented by Ronald A. Offret , Aglietti, Offret & Woofter.

Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Defendant, represented by Sarah Jane Shine , Perkins Coie, LLP & Thomas M. Daniel , Perkins Coie, LLP.

ORDER AND OPINION [Re: Motion at docket 44]

JOHN W. SEDWICK, Senior District Judge.

I. MOTION PRESENTED

At docket 44, defendant Matanuska-Susitna Borough ("MSB") moves to strike the jury demand filed by plaintiff Andrea Richey ("Richey"). Richey's response is at docket 45. MSB replies at docket 46. Oral argument has not been requested and would not assist the court.

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases