1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BARTEL v. CROWLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC.
 

BARTEL v. CROWLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC.

Civil action No. 14-306-JJB-RLB.

WILLIAM E. BARTEL, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF RONALD L. KARNS v. CROWLEY MARINE SERVICES, INC., as successor by merger to DELTA STEAMSHIP LINES, INC. f/k/a MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING COMPANY, ET AL.

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana.

October 1, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E Bartel, Plaintiff, represented by Cameron Ray Waddell , Waddell Anderman, LLC, Jeffery R. Nicholson , Waddell Anderman Law Firm & Jody E. Anderman , Waddell Anderman, LLC.

Crowley Marine Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Annette N. Peltier , Phelps Dunbar, John A. Bolles , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Kevin Jacob LaVie , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Meredith W. Blanque , Phelps Dunbar & Robert J. Barbier , Phelps Dunbar.

Delta Steamship Lines Inc., Defendant, represented by Annette N. Peltier , Phelps Dunbar, John A. Bolles , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Kevin Jacob LaVie , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Meredith W. Blanque , Phelps Dunbar & Robert J. Barbier , Phelps Dunbar.

Mississippi Shipping Company, Defendant, represented by Annette N. Peltier , Phelps Dunbar, John A. Bolles , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Kevin Jacob LaVie , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Meredith W. Blanque , Phelps Dunbar & Robert J. Barbier , Phelps Dunbar.

Rio Grande Transport Inc., Defendant, represented by Annette N. Peltier , Phelps Dunbar, John A. Bolles , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Kevin Jacob LaVie , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Meredith W. Blanque , Phelps Dunbar & Robert J. Barbier , Phelps Dunbar.

Waterman Steamship Corporation, Defendant, represented by John A. Bolles , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Kevin Jacob LaVie , Phelps Dunbar LLP, Meredith W. Blanque , Phelps Dunbar, Robert J. Barbier , Phelps Dunbar & Annette N. Peltier , Phelps Dunbar.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (R. Doc. 7). The motion is opposed. (R. Doc. 8). Based on the undisputed facts and the applicable law as set forth below, Plaintiff's motion should be granted and the action should be remanded to state court.

I. BACKGROUND

William E. Bartel (Plaintiff),1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases