1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SHAW v. INTERTHINX, INC.
 

SHAW v. INTERTHINX, INC.

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01229-REB-BNB.

CELESTE SHAW; and JUDITH VERHEECKE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INTERTHINX, INC., a California Corporation; VERISK ANALYTICS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and JEFFREY MOYER, an individual, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

October 2, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Celeste Shaw, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn , Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Andrew Edward Swan , Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Jessica Lee Riggin , Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, Paul Forrest Lewis , Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Steven M. Tindall , Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP & Rowdy Byron Meeks , Rowdy Meeks Legal Group, LLC.

Judith Verheecke, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Dickson Kuhn , Lewis Kuhn Swan PC, Jessica Lee Riggin , Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, Paul Forrest Lewis , Lewis Kuhn Swan PC & Steven M. Tindall , Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP.

Interthinx, Inc., a Missouri Corporation, Defendant, represented by Nicholas Anthony Murray , Jackson Lewis, P.C., Angela Quiles Nevarez , Jackson Lewis, P.C., Leila Nourani , Jackson Lewis, LLP, Nicky Jatana , Jackson Lewis, LLP & Peter Francis Munger , Jackson Lewis, P.C..

Verisk Analytics, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented by Nicholas Anthony Murray , Jackson Lewis, P.C., Angela Quiles Nevarez , Jackson Lewis, P.C., Leila Nourani , Jackson Lewis, LLP, Nicky Jatana , Jackson Lewis, LLP & Peter Francis Munger , Jackson Lewis, P.C..

Jeffry Moyer, an individual, Defendant, represented by Nicholas Anthony Murray , Jackson Lewis, P.C., Angela Quiles Nevarez , Jackson Lewis, P.C., Leila Nourani , Jackson Lewis, LLP, Nicky Jatana , Jackson Lewis, LLP & Peter Francis Munger , Jackson Lewis, P.C..

ORDER

ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.

This matter is before me sua sponte. As required by my previous Order [#217], filed September 16, 2014, the parties were required to file a joint status to advise the court about the progress of their settlement. The parties have complied with that directive and have shown that they have made substantial progress toward finalizing the settlement. (See Joint Status Report ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases