Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Eddie Gene Dougherty , Dougherty & HOLLO WAY, LLC, Kansas City, Missouri, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs.
Randall Hack , Bryan Hays , Locke Lord, LLP, Chicago, IL, Attorneys for Defendant FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE.
Tom Johnson , Davis Graham & Stubbs, LLP, Denver, CO, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Terence Ridley , Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell, LLP, Denver, CO, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT FIRST AMERICAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Jon Sands , Sweetbaum Sands Anderson, PC, Denver, CO, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Mike Kenny , Alston and Bird, Atlanta, GA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Mark Horning , Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Washington, D.C., ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ACORD CORPORATION
United States District Court, D. Colorado.
ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO ENTER BRIEFING SCHEDULE
JOHN L. KANE, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is an Agreed Motion to Enter Schedule, filed by the Plaintiffs, ECF Docket No. 335. No objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the Motion, including the statements and suggestions contained therein, the file, the record, the representations of the parties, and the underlying agreement. Having done so, the Court finds that an entry of such a schedule is warranted.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the Agreed Motion to Enter Schedule, ECF Docket No. 335, is GRANTED.
2. The agreed briefing schedule is ENTERED, expressly reserving the right of any party to request additional time.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AGREEMENT
1. The represented parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule, while expressly reserving the right to request additional time, as further stated herein:
a. October 13, 2014 will serve as the date for filing of Second Amended Complaint;
b. November 25, 2014 will serve as the date for the filing of Defendants' Responsive Pleadings/Motions to Dismiss;1
c. (If Motions to Dismiss filed) January 9, 2015 will serve as the date for filing Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motions to Dismiss;2
d. February 20, 2015 will serve as the date for filing of any Defendants' Reply In Support of Motions to Dismiss.3
2. The parties may seek more time for the submission of briefs after reviewing the Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand or any other filings. In this regard, circumstances that may warrant an extension of time include, but are not limited to:
a. The nature of the Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand, and the degree of deviation it bears to the previously filed Amended Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand.
b. The length of the Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand.
c. The number of motions to dismiss that are filed by the Defendants and their length. (Defendants intend to consolidate the briefing on any motions to the full extent possible.)
3. The agreement is to be interpreted narrowly, and does not prevent further conferral or motion on other issues collateral to the briefing and the scheduling thereof, such as oral argument or sur-reply.
Comment
User Comments