ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR ORDER: (1) GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; (2) GRANTING CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS; (3) APPOINTING CLASS COUNSEL; (4) APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVES; (5) APPOINTING CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR; AND (6) APPROVING CLASS NOTICE AND CLAIM FORM AND TIMELINE FOR ADMINISTRATION
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
The Court, having carefully considered the briefs and good cause appearing, hereby
1. This Court preliminarily approves the Settlement, and finds that the Settlement is within the range of reasonableness as to both the Settlement Class and Defendant, and that it is the product of good faith, arm's length negotiations between the parties.
2. The Court hereby conditionally certifies the following proposed Settlement Class and included Subclasses:
3. The Court hereby conditionally certifies the proposed Settlement Class and conditionally finds that, solely for the purposes of approving this settlement and for no other purpose and with no other effect on this litigation, the proposed Settlement Class meets the requirements for certification under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 23(a) and 23(b), including that: (a) the proposed is ascertainable and so numerous that joinder of all members of the class is impracticable; (b) there are predominant questions of law or fact common to the proposed class, and there is a well defined community of interest among the members of the proposed class with respect to the subject matter of the litigation; (c) the claims of the Representative Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the members of the proposed class; (d) Representative Plaintiffs and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the class; (e) a class action is superior to other available methods for an efficient method of adjudication of this controversy; and (f) Class Counsel is qualified to act as counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs in their individual and representative capacities.
4. The Court provisionally finds Scott Cole & Associates, APC to be sufficiently experienced and proficient in class action proceedings that they may act as Class Counsel.
5. The Court provisionally appoints Thomas Lusby, Scott Wilsey, Rudae Brown, and Dina Le Fevre as Class Representatives.
6. The Court provisionally appoints Gilardi & Co., LLC as Claims Administrator.
7. The Court approves the proposed Notice of Class Action Settlement ("Class Notice") in the form attached to this Order as
8. Within 10 days of this Preliminary Approval Order, Defendant will provide the Claims Administrator with a database including the names, contact information, and dates of employment in a covered position for members of the Settlement Class ("Class Data"). This data is within Defendant's employment records.
9. An initial notice will be mailed within 21 business days from the date the Claims Administrator receives the Class Data. The initial notice will consist of the Settlement Documents as described in paragraph 7 of this Order.
10. Representative Plaintiffs' papers in support of any application for an award of attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses to Class Counsel, and any application for Enhancement Awards to the Representative Plaintiffs, shall be filed with the Court on or before
11. At least 28 days prior to the Final Approval Hearing, Plaintiffs will file a motion for final approval and judgment, as well as a declaration from the Claims Administrator showing its efforts to mail the Class Notice.
12. The final approval hearing shall be held on
13. Should the proposed Settlement be approved, following the final approval hearing, the Court shall enter judgment in accordance with the Settlement that will adjudicate the rights of all Class Members who do not opt-out, including the named Plaintiffs.
14. Unless otherwise modified by the Court, the dates for performance are as follows:
EXHIBIT 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM THIS SETTLEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
A proposed class action settlement (the "Settlement") of the above-captioned action (the "Action") filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California (the "Court"), has been reached by the parties and has been granted preliminary approval by the Court supervising the Action.
A final settlement hearing will be held on
II. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION
Plaintiffs Thomas Lusby, Scott Wilsey, Rudae Brown, and Dina Le Fevre ("Plaintiffs") allege in their First Amended Complaint that, during the applicable limitations period, GameStop required class members to work off-the-clock, failed to provide meal and rest breaks, failed to provide accurate itemized wage statements, failed to pay wages timely upon Class members' terminations, and failed to reimburse for business expenses. Plaintiffs allege that these violations resulted in underpayment of wages and unreimbursed expenses to Class Members. Plaintiffs also seek civil penalties related to these claims. Plaintiffs seek to maintain a class action for their claims on behalf of themselves and all overtime-eligible employees by GameStop, in one or more of GameStop's California retail stores, between June 21, 2010 and June 30, 2012. This includes the job positions of Store Manager, Store Manager in Training, Area Manager, Assistant Store Manager, Senior Game Advisor, Lead Game Advisor, and Game Advisor.
GameStop denies any liability or wrongdoing of any kind in connection with Plaintiff's claims, and contends that the company has had, during all relevant times, a policy prohibiting the off-the-clock work alleged in the Action, and that putative class members have not worked off-the-clock with GameStop's knowledge. Accordingly, GameStop denies that any liability exists for alleged failure to compensate Class Members for off-the-clock work. GameStop further asserts that class members are and were provided with meal and rest breaks as required by California law, that Class Members are and have been provided with itemized wage statements that comply with California law, that Class Members are and were properly compensated upon termination, and that Class Members were reimbursed for business expenses as required by law. Consequently, GameStop does not believe that it is liable to Plaintiffs or Class Members, or that Plaintiffs or Class Members are entitled to recover any money.
The Court granted preliminary approval of the Settlement on [date of preliminary approval] on behalf of a settlement class defined as:
At that time, the Court also preliminarily approved Plaintiffs Thomas Lusby, Scott Wilsey, Rudae Brown, and Dina Le Fevre to serve as Class Representatives, and the law firm Scott Cole & Associates, APC to serve as the lawyers for the Class Members ("Class Counsel").
The Court also scheduled a Final Approval Hearing on the Settlement at ____ p.m. on _________ _______, 2014, in Courtroom __, United States District Court, Northern District of California, located at _________, _________, at which time the Court will decide whether to grant final approval of the Settlement.
III. SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT TERMS
Only Class Members who have properly filed a completed Claim Form by the deadline, and who did not opt out of the Settlement as provided for below ("Qualified Claimants"), will be entitled to receive a payment pursuant to the Settlement. If the conditions of the Settlement (as described in this Notice) are met, and if the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, then settlement checks will be mailed to Class Members who submit valid Claim Forms by the deadline. If Settlement Payments are not claimed by Class Members, any unclaimed amounts will be re-allocated to Qualified Claimants on a proportionate basis as described in the above paragraph.
All Class Members will be subject to these Releases whether or not they return the Claim Form necessary to receive payment of their allocated settlement amount, unless they formally opt-out.
IV. RIGHT TO CLAIM MONEY FROM THE SETTLEMENT
Class Members who want to receive money under the Settlement must completely fill out, sign and date the enclosed Claim Form and mail the completed form
The Claim Form lists the dates you worked in a Covered Position during the Class Period. If you believe the data listed on the Claim Form is incorrect, you may submit a challenge in writing to the Claims Administrator indicating your belief as to the correct data. You must also send the Claims Administrator any documents or other information that supports your challenge to the information on the Claim Form. The Claims Administrator will use records of GameStop and any information you provide to resolve any dispute about your employment data. All such challenges must be postmarked by _______, 2014 or they will not be considered. Class Members who do not submit a Claim Form, or who do not file Claim Forms by the deadline,
V. RIGHT TO OPT OUT
If you do not wish to participate in the Settlement of your claims, you may exclude yourself from the Settlement or "opt out."
VI. RIGHT TO OBJECT
If you are a Class Member who has not opted out and believe that the Settlement should not be finally approved by the Court for any reason, you may object to the proposed Settlement. Objections must be in writing, state the basis for any objection, and must be filed with the Court on or before _________, 2014. At the same time, copies of objections must also be mailed or delivered to Class Counsel and counsel for GameStop at the following addresses:
If you wish to object and have the objection considered by the Court, you may also appear at the Final Approval Hearing scheduled for __________, 2014 at _____.m., in Courtroom __, United States District Court, Northern District of California, located at _________, _________. You have the right to appear either in person or through your own attorney at this hearing. Objections not previously filed in writing in a timely manner as described above will not be considered by the Court. Any attorney who intends to represent an individual objecting to the Settlement must file a notice of appearance with the Court and serve counsel for all parties, above, on or before ____________, 2014. All objections or other correspondence must state the name and number of the case, which is Lusby v. GameStop et al., United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:12-CV-03783-HRL. If you object to the Settlement, you will remain a member of the Class, and if the Court approves the Settlement, you will be bound by the terms of the Settlement in the same way as Class Members who do not object. Any Class Member who does not object in the manner provided above shall have waived any objection to the Settlement, and will not be able to appeal.
VII. HEARING ON THE SETTLEMENT
The Final Approval Hearing on the adequacy, reasonableness and fairness of the Settlement will be held at _____ _.m. on _______, 2014 in Courtroom __, United States District Court, Northern District of California, located at _________, _________. The Hearing may be continued without further notice.
VIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This Notice is only a summary of the Action and the Settlement. Class Members should contact the Claims Administrator with any concerns or questions regarding the Settlement. You may also refer to the pleadings, the Stipulation of Settlement, and other papers filed in the Action by accessing the Court docket in this case through the Court's Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, or by visiting the office of the Office of the Clerk for the United States District Court, Northern District of California, located at 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95113, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Court holidays.
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE CLERK OF THE COURT OR THE JUDGE WITH QUESTIONS.
EXHIBIT 2
Lusby v. GameStop
United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:12-CV-03783-HRL
CLAIM FORM
YOUR MINIMUM SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT BEFORE TAXES AND OTHER WITHHOLDINGS, IF APPLICABLE, IS $ ________________________________________________. Your actual share may vary depending on the number of claim forms submitted.
Lusby v. GameStop Claims Administration Center <<Claims Administrator>> <<Address>> <<Phone>>
GameStop's records show that, within the Class Period, you worked in a Covered Position in California during the following time period(s): <<Dates>>
If you believe the data listed above is incorrect, you may submit a challenge in writing to the Claims Administrator, at the address listed above. You must also send the Claims Administrator any documents or other information that supports your challenge. The Claims Administrator will use records of GameStop and any information you provide to resolve any dispute about your employment data. All such challenges must be postmarked no later than __________, 2014. Please keep in mind that only employees who were employed by GameStop in a Covered Position in California at some time during the time period June 21, 2010 to June 30, 2012 are eligible to participate in the Settlement.
It is your responsibility to keep a current address on file with the Claims Administrator. Please make sure to notify the Claims Administrator of any change of address.
Comment
User Comments