GONZALEZ v. HARRIS RANCH BEEF COMPANY

Case No. 1:14-cv-00038-LIO-SAB.

JOSE GONZALEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS RANCH BEEF COMPANY, a California corporation; HARRIS RANCH BEEF HOLDING COMPANY, a California corporation; HARRIS FARMS, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 2 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. HARRIS FARMS, INC., a California corporation, Cross-Complainant, v. SPRINGER-MILLER SYSTEMS, INC., a Vermont corporation and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Cross-Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division.

August 5, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COOLEY LLP WHITTY SOMVICHIAN , DAVID S. HOUSKA , San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Cross-Defendant PAR SPRINGER-MILLER SYSTEMS, INC.

WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN, LAW CORPORATION ALDEN J. PARKER , MEAGAN D. CHRISTIANSEN , Attorneys for Cross-Plaintiff HARRIS FARMS, INC.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 143 and 230, Cross-Plaintiff Harris Farms, Inc. ("Harris Farms") and Cross-Defendant PAR Springer-Miller Systems, Inc. ("PAR Springer-Miller") (Harris Farms and PAR Springer-Miller collectively "the Parties"), stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Gonzalez filed a putative class action lawsuit against Harris Farms on December 4, 2013;

WHEREAS, Harris Farms subsequently filed a cross-complaint against PAR Springer-Miller on June 2, 2014;

WHEREAS, PAR Springer-Miller filed its Motion to Dismiss the Cross Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on July 29, 2014;

WHERAS, PAR Springer-Miller initially scheduled a hearing on its Motion for August 28, 2014;

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rules 143 and 230 collectively allow the parties to jointly request the court to continue the hearing and modify the briefing schedule accordingly;

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties agree that changing the date and briefing schedule for the hearing will be more convenient for the Parties;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree and request that the hearing be continued until September 11 at 8:30 am, that Harris Farms' deadline to file its opposition to the Motion be set to August 21, and that PAR Springer-Miller's deadline to file its reply be set to September 4.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

The hearing on PAR Springer-Miller's Motion to Dismiss the Cross-Complaint be continued until September 11 at 8:30 am, that Harris Farms' deadline to file its opposition to the Motion be set at August 21, and that PAR Springer-Miller's deadline to file its reply be set to September 4.

SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases