1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 28 F.Supp.3d
  5. 28 F.Supp.3d 1134 (2014)
 

LATIF v. HOLDER

No. 3:10-CV-00750-BR.

28 F.Supp.3d 1134 (2014)

Ayman LATIF, Mohamed Sheikh Abdirahm Kariye, Raymond Earl Knaeble IV, Steven William Washburn, Nagib Ali Ghaleb, Abdullatif Muthanna, Faisal Nabin Kashem, Elias Mustafa Mohamed, Ibraheim Y. Mashal, Salah Ali Ahmed, Amir Meshal, Stephen Durga Persaud, and Mashaal Rana, Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; James B. Comey, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Christopher M. Piehota, in his official capacity as Director of the FBI Terrorist Screening Center, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

Signed June 24, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Wilker , Tonkon Torp LLP, Kevin Diaz , American Civil Liberties Union, Portland, OR, Hina Shamsi , American Civil Liberties Union, Christopher M. Egleson , Justin H. Bell , Mitchell P. Hurley , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, NY, Alexandra F. Smith , Laura Schauer Ives , ACLU Foundation of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, Ahilan Arulanantham , Jennifer Pasquarella , ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Alan L. Schlosser , Julia Harumi Mass , ACLU of Northern California, San Francisco, CA, Reem Salahi , Salahi Law, Santa Monica, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Devin N. Robinson , Stewart Shadduck & Robinson LLC, Portland, OR, Rita M. Siemion , Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae the Constitution Project.

Eric H. Holder, Jr. , United States Attorney General, Amy Elizabeth Powell , United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, S. Amanda Marshall , United States Attorney, James E. Cox, Jr. , Assistant United States Attorney, District of Oregon, Portland, OR, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion (#85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion (#91) for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties each seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs' Claim One of the Third Amended Complaint (#83) (that Defendants violated Plaintiffs'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases