1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. IN RE ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
 

IN RE ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-57079-ER, MDL Docket No. 875.

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. VI). OSCAR ALLEN CORLEY, Administrator of the Estate Of Charles Corley, deceased, Plaintiff, v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

April 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

OSCAR ALLEN CORLEY, Plaintiff, represented by GROVER PATTERSON KEAHEY, JR. , LAW OFFICES OF G. PATTERSON KEAHEY, PC.

CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by STEPHEN C. MUSILLI , VORYS SATER SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP & RICHARD D. SCHUSTER , VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE.

CRANE COMPANY, Defendant, represented by MICHAEL J. ZUKOWSKI , K&L GATES.

CROWN, CORK & SEAL CO., INC., Defendant, represented by BETH A. SEBAUGH , BONEZZI SWITZER MURPHY POLITO HUPP CO LPA.

DANA CORP., Defendant, represented by STEPHEN C. MUSILLI , VORYS SATER SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP & RICHARD D. SCHUSTER , VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE.

GOODRICH, B.F., Defendant, represented by STEPHEN C. MUSILLI , VORYS SATER SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP & RICHARD D. SCHUSTER , VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE.

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., Defendant, represented by STEPHEN C. MUSILLI , VORYS SATER SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP & RICHARD D. SCHUSTER , VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE.

INGERSOLL-RAND CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by MARY MARGARET GAY , FORMAN PERRY WATKINS KRUTZ & TARDY LLP.

JAMES WALKER MFG. CO., Defendant, represented by BRUCE P. MANDEL , ULMER & BERNE.

JOHN CRANE INC., Defendant, represented by STEPHEN H. DANIELS , MCMAHON DEGULIS LLP.

MORTELL COMPANY, Defendant, represented by CLARE SMITH RUSH , FORMAN PERRY WATKINS KRUTZ TARDY LLP & JENNIFER A. RIESTER , WESTON HURD.

SELBY BATTERSBY AND CO., Defendant, represented by FRANCIS MCGILL HADDEN , GIBBONS P.C. & JOSEPH M. CINCOTTA , GIBBONS P.C..

ORDER

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED; and (2) The Motion for a Continuance and to Amend (incorporated into ECF No. 26) is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases