1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STOLER v. INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE NUTRITION
 

STOLER v. INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE NUTRITION

No. 13 Civ. 1275.

BAILEY STOLER, AMY HESS, and JESSICA MARCUS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE NUTRITION and JOSHUA ROSENTHAL, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 18, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Valdi Licul, Esq. , Rebecca J. Osborne, Esq. , VLADECK, WALDMAN, ELIAS & ENGELHARD, P.C., New York, NY, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Andrew P. Marks, Esq. , LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendants.

OPINION

ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Institute for Integration Nutrition ("TIN") and Joshua Rosenthal ("Rosenthal") (collectively, the "Defendants") in this putative class action have moved pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Second Cause of Action (Retaliation under Title VII), the Third Cause of Action (Interference under the FMLA), the Fourth Cause of Action (Retaliation under the FMLA) and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases