IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS (JCS).

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

September 23, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, BELINDA S LEE , San Francisco, CA, Counsel for Defendants TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY KOREA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, AND TOSHIBA CORPORATION Liaison Counsel for Defendants TEAC CORPORATION, TEAC AMERICA INC., KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N. LITE-ON IT CORPORATION, PHILIPS & LITON DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CORP., PHILIPS & LITE-ON DIGITAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., SONY CORPORATION, SONY OPTIARC AMERICA, INC., SONY OPTIARC, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., BENQ CORPORATION, BENQ AMERICA CORP., NEC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, QUANTA STORAGE INC., QUANTA STORAGE AMERICA INC., HITACHI-LG DATA STORAGE, INC., HITACHI-LG DATA STORAGE KOREA, INC., HITACHI LTD., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., PIONEER NORTH AMERICA, INC., AND PIONEER ELECTRONICS (USA) INC.

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, SHANA E. SCARLETT , Jeff D. Friedman (173886), Berkeley, CA.

Steve W. Berman , (Pro Hac Vice), George W. Sampson (Pro Hac Vice), HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Seattle, WA.

Lee Gordon SBN (174168), HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Pasadena, CA, Interim Lead Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs.

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. CADIO ZIRPOLI (179108), Guido Saveri (22349), R. Alexander Saveri , (173102), San Francisco, CA, Interim Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Class.

ALSTON & BIRD LLP, Rodney J. Ganske , Michael P. Kenny , Debra D. Bernstein , Andrew J. Tuck , Atlanta, Georgia, Counsel for Plaintiff Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, STATE OF FLORIDA Lizabeth A. Brady , Tallahassee, Florida.


[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEPOSITION PROTOCOL NO. 2

JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

I. DEPOSITION PROCEDURES

A. This Order Re Deposition Protocol No. 2 is intended to supplement the Court's prior Orders regarding depositions, including the Case Management Order dated July 17, 2012 (dkt. 606); Order Re Deposition Scheduling dated August 31, 2012 (dkt. 631); Order Re Location...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases