1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DILLOW v. POLK
 

DILLOW v. POLK

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-98, No. 3:12-CV-99., 3:12-CV-100, 3:12-CV-101, 3:12-CV-102, 3:12-CV-103, 3:12-CV-104, 3:12-CV-105, 3:12-CV-106, 3:12-CV-107, 3:12-CV-108, 3:12-CV-109, 3:12-CV-110, 3:12-CV-111

VALERI DILLOW, CHIKA GERLADINE AHUNANYA, ERNEST AKNONWAH, TABITHA BARRETT, AMANDA BARTON, JAMIE BEACHLEY, CHRISTINE KAMUGA, NIKKI KENDIG, DIVINE KUM, LAVERNE PAULINE WATERS, SUFYAN TURAY, VICTORINE NGANG, NUR MUHAMMED, and STEPHANIE MITCHELL, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES H. POLK, MOUNTAIN STATE UNIVERSITY, INC., MOUNTAIN STATE UNIVERSITY BUILDING COMPANY, MOUNTAIN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INC., and MOUNTAIN STATE UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT FUND INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg.

August 1, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amanda Barton, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew C. Skinner , Skinner Law Firm, Laura C. Davis , Skinner Law Firm & Stephen G. Skinner , Skinner Law Firm.

Charles H. Polk, Defendant, represented by Edward P. Tiffey , Edward P. Tiffey, PLLC.

Mountain State University, Inc., Defendant, represented by Allison B. Williams , Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC & John R. Merinar, Jr. , Steptoe & Johnson PLLC.

Mountain State University Building Company, Defendant, represented by Allison B. Williams , Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC & John R. Merinar, Jr. , Steptoe & Johnson PLLC.

Mountain State University Foundation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Allison B. Williams , Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC & John R. Merinar, Jr. , Steptoe & Johnson PLLC.

Mountain State University Endowment Fund, Inc., Defendant, represented by Allison B. Williams , Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC & John R. Merinar, Jr. , Steptoe & Johnson PLLC.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO REMAND

GINA M. GROH, District Judge.

This matter is currently before the court on the parties' Joint Motion to Remand [Doc. 29] filed on July 25, 2013. The parties move, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), for an order remanding this case to the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion to remand.

I....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases