1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. COOK INCORPORATED v. ENDOLOGIX, INC.
 

COOK INCORPORATED v. ENDOLOGIX, INC.

No. 1:09-cv-01248-TWP-DKL.

COOK INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. ENDOLOGIX, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

July 6, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COOK INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley G. Lane , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Bryan John Leitenberger , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Danielle Anne Phillip , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Jason W. Schigelone , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Kelly J. Eberspecher , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE & Ralph J. Gabric , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE.

ENDOLOGIX, INC., Defendant, represented by Andrew W. Hull , HOOVER HULL LLP, Daniel K. Burke , HOOVER HULL LLP, John David Evered , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP., Pro Hac Vice, John B. Sganga, Jr, , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP., Pro Hac Vice, Joseph S. Cianfrani , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP, Pro Hac Vice & Joshua J. Stowell , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP., Pro Hac Vice.

ENDOLOGIX, INC., Counter Claimant, represented by Andrew W. Hull , HOOVER HULL LLP, Daniel K. Burke , HOOVER HULL LLP, John David Evered , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP., Pro Hac Vice, John B. Sganga, Jr, , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP., Pro Hac Vice, Joseph S. Cianfrani , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP, Pro Hac Vice & Joshua J. Stowell , KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP., Pro Hac Vice.

COOK INCORPORATED, Counter Defendant, represented by Bradley G. Lane , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Bryan John Leitenberger , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Danielle Anne Phillip , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Jason W. Schigelone , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, Kelly J. Eberspecher , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE & Ralph J. Gabric , BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE.

ENTRY ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT ISSUE OF CONTRACTUAL ESTOPPEL

TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge.

The present motion poses a difficult question: can a broadly-worded, albeit fairly generic, release that was part of a Settlement Agreement meant to end a lawsuit relating to non-compete agreements subsequently bar a much different second lawsuit that relates to patent infringement? Under the circumstances in this case, the Court finds that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases