1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GHARB v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC AUTOMATION, INC.
 

GHARB v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC AUTOMATION, INC.

No. 10 C 07204.

SAMY GHARB, Plaintiff, v. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC AUTOMATION, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

June 4, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samy Gharb, Plaintiff, represented by Howard B. Rockman , Howard B. Rockman & Associates.

Mitsubishi Electric Automation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Terrence Joseph Truax , Jenner & Block LLP & Joseph Albert Saltiel , Jenner & Block LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EDMOND E. CHANG, District Judge.

Plaintiff Samy Gharb filed a first amended complaint against Defendant Mitsubishi Electric Automation, Inc. (for short, Mitsubishi Automation) claiming infringement on his patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,552,654.1 R. 15. Mitsubishi Automation moves to dismiss the first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). R. 23. For reasons explained more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases