1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FRANK v. SHELL OIL COMPANY
 

FRANK v. SHELL OIL COMPANY

No. 11-871.

LOIS FRANK v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Section "L"(3).

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

April 11, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lois Frank, individually and on behalf of Welman Frank, Plaintiff, represented by L. Eric Williams, Jr. , Williams Law Office, LLC, Richard Julius Fernandez , Richard J. Fernandez, LLC & Amber E. Cisney , Richard J. Fernandez, LLC.

Shell Oil Company, indemnitor of The Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendant, represented by Mary S. Johnson , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (Mandeville), Chadwick J. Mollere , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (New Orleans), Charles Stanton Perry , Haynes & Boone, LLP (Houston), PRO HAC VICE, Heidi Thomas , Haynes & Boone, LLP (Houston), PRO HAC VICE, Ingrid Marina Kemp , Johnson Gray McNamara, LLC, Jill Thompson Losch , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (Mandeville) & S. Suzanne Mahoney , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (New Orleans).

Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Kristopher T. Wilson , Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard (New Orleans), Reed S. Minkin , Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard (New Orleans) & Travis Brendon Wilkinson , Kantrow, Spaht, Weaver & Blitzer.

Shell Chemical LP, indemnitor of The Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendant, represented by Mary S. Johnson , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (Mandeville), Chadwick J. Mollere , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (New Orleans), Charles Stanton Perry , Haynes & Boone, LLP (Houston), PRO HAC VICE, Heidi Thomas , Haynes & Boone, LLP (Houston), PRO HAC VICE, Ingrid Marina Kemp , Johnson Gray McNamara, LLC, Jill Thompson Losch , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (Mandeville) & S. Suzanne Mahoney , Johnson, Gray, McNamara, LLC (New Orleans).

ORDER & REASONS

ELDON FALLON, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants Shell Oil Company and Shell Chemical LP's (collectively "Shell") Rule 59 Motion for New Trial or Reconsideration and Motion to Alter or Amend Order and Reasons. (R. Doc. 41). The Court has reviewed the briefing submitted by the parties, as well as the relevant facts and applicable law, and is now ready to rule. For the following reasons, IT IS ORDERED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases