RAYTHEON COMPANY v. U.S.

No. 05-448C.

RAYTHEON COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of Federal Claims.

April 29, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen L. Manos, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Christyne K. Brennan, Washington, DC, of counsel.

C. Coleman Bird, Washington, DC, with whom were Assistant Attorney General Tony West, and Director Jeanne E. Davidson, for defendant. Lawrence S. Rabyne, Defense Contract Management Agency, Arlington Heights, IL, of counsel.

Richard D. Bernstein, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae General Electric Company. Howard Stanislawski, Washington, DC and Alan C. Brown, McLean, VA, of counsel.


OPINION

NANCY B. FIRESTONE, District Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). At issue is whether Raytheon's post-retirement benefit ("PRB")1 costs are "pension costs" within the meaning of Cost Accounting Standard ("CAS") 412.40(a), 48 C.F.R. § 9904.412-40(a) (2010).2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases