1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HANCOCK v. POMAZAL
 

HANCOCK v. POMAZAL

No. CIV S-09-0065 DAD P.

JEFF HANCOCK, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW POMAZAL, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

November 17, 2009.

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 19, 2009, defendants moved to dismiss this action, arguing that it is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiff has filed an opposition to that motion. Defendants have not filed a reply. The parties in this action have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases