1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 119 F.4th
  5. 119 F.4th 1355 (2024)
 

NEXSTEP, INC. v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

2022-1815, 2022-2005, 2022-2113.

119 F.4th 1355 (2024)

NEXSTEP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: October 24, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Andre, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Christina M. Finn, James R. Hannah, Lisa Kobialka; Aaron M. Frankel, Cristina Martinez, Carlos J. Tirado, New York, NY.

Thomas Saunders, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by Amy K. Wigmore; William F. Lee, George Fanton Manley, Sarah B. Petty, Boston, MA; Lauren Matlock-Colangelo, New York, NY; Mary Virginia Sooter, Denver, CO.

Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge Reyna.

NexStep, Inc., (NexStep) appeals from a final judgment that Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, (Comcast) did not infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 8,885,802 ('802 patent) and 8,280,009 ('009 patent). After construing the term "VoIP" in the '802 patent, the district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement. The '009 patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases