1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 116 F.4th
  5. 116 F.4th 1345 (2024)
 

PARKERVISION, INC. v. QUALCOMM INC.

2022-1755, 2024-2221.

116 F.4th 1345 (2024)

PARKERVISION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 6, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua Wright Budwin, McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Matthew Cameron, Joel Lance Thollander, Raymond Mitchell Verboncoeur; Kevin L. Burgess, Marshall, TX.

Eamonn Gardner, Cooley LLP, Denver, CO, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Matthew J. Brigham, Dena Chen, Jeffrey S. Karr, Benjamin S. Lin, Priya B. Viswanath, Palo Alto, CA; Stephen Smith, Washington, DC; Michael Edward Lockamy, Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Coxe, P.A., Jacksonville, FL.

Before Lourie, Mayer, and Stark, Circuit Judges.

More than nine years ago, we affirmed a judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") of non-infringement in a patent infringement action brought by ParkerVision, Inc. ("ParkerVision") against Qualcomm Inc. ("Qualcomm") relating to wireless communications technology. ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., 621 F. App'x 1009 (Fed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases