NEW YORK POWER AUTH. & HUDSON TRANSMISSION v. FERC

No. 20-1283 Consolidated with 20-1352.

109 F.4th 550 (2024)

NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY AND HUDSON TRANSMISSION PARTNERS, LLC, Petitioners v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 26, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucas C. Townsend argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the joint briefs were Gary D. Levenson, Lawrence G. Acker, Gary D. Bachman, and William R. Hollaway, Ph.D.

Susanna Y. Chu, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Matthew R. Christiansen, General Counsel, and Robert H. Solomon, Solicitor.

John Longstreth argued the cause for respondent-intervenor PPL Electric Utilities Corporation. With him on the brief was Donald A. Kaplan. Steven M. Nadel entered an appearance.

Before: Rao, Walker and Childs, Circuit Judges.


When Hudson Transmission Partners owned firm rights to draw electricity from the PJM grid, it was assessed costs for certain improvements. Hudson relinquished its firm rights in 2017. The question presented here is whether, under the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff ("PJM Tariff"), Hudson must continue paying the previously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases