MUSQUIZ v. U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

No. 23-8.

DOMINGO MUSQUIZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 3, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn M. Davis (argued), Law Office of Kathryn M. Davis, Pasadena, California; Peter R. Afrasiabi . One LLP, Newport Beach, California; Alfred Hwang and Emily Lovell , Certified Law Students; University of California Irvine School of Law, Appellate Litigation Clinic, Irvine, California; for Petitioner.

Patrick S. Polk (argued), General Attorney; Kelli D. Johnson , Assistant General Counsel; Ana M. Kocur , General Counsel; United States Railroad Retirement Board, Office of the General Counsel, Chicago, Illinois; for Respondent.

Opinion by Judge Gould.


OPINION

Domingo Musquiz petitions for review of the final decision of the United States Railroad Retirement Board ("RRB"). The RRB affirmed and adopted an RRB hearings officer's decision that found that Musquiz was "not without fault" in causing an overpayment of his reduced-age annuity under the Railroad Retirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases