1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A. v. RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC.
 

PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A. v. RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC.

No. 2022-1846.

PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A., Appellant, v. RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 14, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GABRIEL K. BELL , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by MAXIMILIAN A. GRANT , JONATHAN M. STRANG , DAVID ZUCKER ; TAKASHI OKUDA , New York, NY; GREGORY SOBOLSKI , San Francisco, CA.

GREGORY A. CASTANIAS , Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by AMELIA A. DEGORY ; ROBERT BREETZ , DAVID B. COCHRAN , KENNETH LUCHESI , DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA , Cleveland, OH; JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE , Pittsburgh, PA.

Before CHEN, STOLL, and CUNNINGHAM,

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Philip Morris Products, S.A. (Philip Morris) appeals an inter partes review (IPR) final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board determining Philip Morris did not meet its burden of proving certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,901,123 ('123 patent) unpatentable...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases