1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 53 F.4th
  5. 53 F.4th 1376 (2022)
 

CUPP COMPUTING AS v. TREND MICRO INC.

2020-2262, 2020-2263, 2020-2264.

53 F.4th 1376 (2022)

CUPP COMPUTING AS, Appellant v. TREND MICRO INC., Appellee Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 16, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Andre, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by James R. Hannah; Cristina Martinez, Jeffrey Price, New York, NY.

Robert Buergi, DLA Piper LLP (US), East Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Mark D. Fowler; Stanley Joseph Panikowski, III, San Diego, CA.

Michael S. Forman, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Sarah E. Craven, Thomas W. Krause, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stark, Circuit Judges.

CUPP Computing AS ("CUPP") appeals three inter partes review ("IPR") decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") concluding that petitioner Trend Micro Inc. had shown challenged claims in CUPP's U.S. Patents Nos. 8,631,488 ("'488 patent"), 9,106,683 ("'683 patent"), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases