WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

No. 20-1191.

14 F.4th 276 (2021)

WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and NATIONAL Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys; Human Rights Watch; Pen American Center; Global Fund for Women; The Nation Magazine; the Rutherford Institute; Washington Office on Latin America; Amnesty International USA, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE; General Paul M. Nakasone, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; Office of the Director of National Intelligence; Richard Grenell, in his official capacity as acting Director of National Intelligence; Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General; Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees. Center for Democracy & Technology; New America's Open Technology Institute; David H. Kaye, Evidence Law Professor; Edward J. Imwinkelried, Evidence Law Professor; D. Michael Risinger, Evidence Law Professor; Rebecca Wexler, Evidence Law Professor; Professor Stephen I. Vladeck; Americans for Prosperity Foundation; Brennan Center for Justice; Electronic Frontier Foundation; Electronic Privacy Information Center; Freedom-works Foundation; TechFreedom; Network Engineers and Technologists, Amici Supporting Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: September 15, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Patrick Christopher Toomey , AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York, for Appellant. Joseph Forrest Busa , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Deborah A. Jeon , David R. Rocah , AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Ashley Gorski , Charles Hogle , AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York; Benjamin H. Kleine , COOLEY LLP, San Francisco, California; Alex Abdo , Jameel Jaffer , KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, New York, New York, for Appellant. Ethan P. Davis , Acting Assistant Attorney General, H. Thomas Byron III , Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Avery W. Gardiner , Gregory T. Nojeim , Mana Azarmi , Stan Adams , CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY, Washington, D.C.; Sharon Bradford Franklin , Ross Schulman , NEW AMERICA'S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C.; Andrew A. Bank , Bret S. Cohen , Allison M. Holt Ryan , Stevie N. DeGroff , HOGAN LOVELS US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Center for Democracy & Technology and New America's Open Technology Institute. Benjamin B. Au , W. Henry Huttinger , Los Angeles, California, Aditya V. Kamdar , DURIE TANGRI LLP, San Francisco, California, for Amici Evidence Law Professors. Lauren Gallo White , San Francisco, California, Brian M. Willen , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, New York, New York, for Amicus Professor Stephen I. Vladeck. Eric R. Bolinder , AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, Arlington, Virginia; Sophia Cope , Mark Rumold , Andrew Cocker , ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, San Francisco, California, for Amici Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Brennan Center for Justice, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Electronic Privacy Information Center, FreedomWorks Foundation, and TechFreedom. Jonathan Blavin , Elizabeth Kim , Alexander Gorin , MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP, San Francisco, California, for Amici Network Engineers and Technologists.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Diaz wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge Motz joined as to Parts I and II.A, and in which Judge Rushing joined as to Part II.B.2 and C. Judge Motz wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. Judge Rushing wrote an opinion concurring in part and in the judgment.


We consider, for the second time, the Wikimedia Foundation's contentions that the government is spying on its communications using Upstream, an electronic surveillance program run by the National Security Agency ("NSA"). In the first appeal, we found Wikimedia's allegations of Article III standing sufficient to survive a motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases