CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON (19-4161); City of Portland, Oregon, et al. (19-4162); State of Hawaii (19-4163); Alliance for Communications Democracy, et al. (19-4164); Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al. (19-4165); City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (19-4166); City of Chicago, Illinois, et al. (19-4183), Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America, Respondents,
NCTA — The Internet & Television Association (19-4161-4166/4183); City of New York, New York, et al. (19-4162); Bloomfield Township, Michigan, et al. (19-4165); City of Aurora, Colorado, et al. (19-4183), Intervenors.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Before: McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.
Over the past 15 years, the Federal Communications Commission has published a series of written orders that, together with Title VI of the Communications Act ("the Act"), 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq., set forth rules by which state and local governments may regulate cable providers. Numerous local...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.