1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KEYNETIK, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.
 

KEYNETIK, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.

No. 2020-1270.

KEYNETIK, INC., Appellant, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: December 23, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

EDWARD F. BEHM , Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK W. HALDERMAN .

PHILLIP W. CITROEN , Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI , CHETAN BANSAL , STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD , JOSEPH PALYS .

Before DYK, CLEVENGER, and O'MALLEY,

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appellant KEYnetik, Inc. ("KEYnetik") appeals a final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") finding claims 22 and 23 of U.S. Patent No. 7,966,146 B2 ("the '146 patent") unpatentable as obvious. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd. v. KEYnetik, Inc.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases