IN RE CLINTON

No. 20-5056.

IN RE: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON AND CHERYL MILLS, Petitioners.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided August 31, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Kendall argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the petition for writ of mandamus and the reply were Katherine M. Turner , Stephen L. Wohlgemuth , Suraj Kumar , and Beth A. Wilkinson.

Ramona R. Cotca argued the cause for respondent Judicial Watch, Inc. With her on the response to the petition for writ of mandamus were Lauren M. Burke and Paul J. Orfanedes . Michael Bekesha entered an appearance.

Mark R. Freeman , Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent United States Department of State. With him on the response to the petition for writ of mandamus were Hashim M. Mooppan , Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and Mark B. Stern , Attorney.

Opinion for the Court filed by WILKINS.


This petition arises from a Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") case brought by Judicial Watch, Inc. against the U.S. Department of State. See Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Dep't of State, No. 1:14-cv-1242 (D.D.C. filed July 21, 2014). Petitioners are former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (a third-party intervenor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases