1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 957 F.3d
  5. 957 F.3d 1334 (2020)
 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. X ONE, INC.

2019-1164.

957 F.3d 1334 (2020)

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant, v. X ONE, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: May 5, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Dryer , Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Lauren Ann Degnan , Michael John Ballanco , Walter Karl Renner .

Doris Johnson Hines , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Jeffrey Curtiss Totten ; Kevin D. Rodkey , Atlanta, GA; Jacob Adam Schroeder , Palo Alto, CA.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Dyk and Wallach, Circuit Judges.

Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") appeals from a final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") finding claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,798,593 ("the '593 patent") not unpatentable as obvious. Uber Techs., Inc. v. X One, Inc., No. IPR2017-01255, Paper No. 41 (PTAB Oct. 12, 2018)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases