1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 958 F.3d
  5. 958 F.3d 604 (2020)
 

ACCESS LIVING OF METRO. CHICAGO v. UBER TECHNO.

No. 19-2116.

958 F.3d 604 (2020)

ACCESS LIVING OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 5, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Paul Blonder, I , Attorney, Daniel Adam Hantman , Attorney, Jonathan L. Loew , Attorney, Much Shelist, P.C., Charles Robert Petrof , Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bryan Killian , Attorney, Stephanie Schuster , Attorney, Clara Kollm , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, Kristal D. Petrovich , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL, Anne Marie Estevez , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Kara Jane Janssen , Attorney, Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Amici Curiae.

Before Easterbrook, Rovner, and Scudder, Circuit Judges.

Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act's public accommodation provisions apply to ridesharing companies like Uber is unsettled. The lawsuit underlying this appeal presents that question and the many complexities that come with considering Uber's business model and the discrimination proscribed by the ADA. Before us are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases